This presentation describes the current status of 25 GbE technology in IP production. It also provides jitter and wander measurements for 10 and 25 GbE systems using experimental data, thereby showing how 25 GbE networks are almost in production phase.

File Type: pdf
Categories: Network Infrastructure
Presenters : Koji Oyama - M3L
Year : 2019
dlp_document_download : © 2019 M3L Inc. C U R A T E D B Y I P S H O W C A S E T H E AT E R AT N A B – A P R I L 8 -11 , 2 01 9 Current Status of ST 2110 over 25 GbE Koji Oyama, M3L Inc. © 2019 M3L Inc. Who we are • M3L Inc. (株式会社メディアリンクスエルエスアイラボ ) • http://www.m3l.co.jp/en/ ‒ Found : April 1997 ‒ Capital : JPY 10M ‒ President : Kenji Fukuda ‒ Office : Kawasaki, Japan ‒ Employees : 9 • Independent IP -Core Design Company • IP Core: Reusable logic design blocks ( See Wiki ) ‒ Mission: Speedy & High Quality ‒ Vision: Pursue ideal IP cores • Value: 15+ years Experience with Professional Video Over IP technology • IP : Internet Protocol ( See Wiki ), Professional Video Over IP ( See Wiki ) 2 © 2019 M3L Inc. Current 10 GbE - based System • JT -NM TR -1001 -1:2018 v1.0 shows the overview of broadcast IP network 3 Quoted from http://jt -nm.org/documents/JT -NM_TR -1001 -1:2018_v1.0.pdf 10G ports 10G / 40G (4x10G) / 100G (10x10G) ports 1G/10G ports 1G/10G ports 1G/10G ports • Good for 1080p(3G)/1080i(1.5G) • Cost/Performance • Best Practice 1G/10G ports © 2019 M3L Inc. What’s next? • Future: ‒ High resolution: 4K60P – 12Gb/s, 8K60P – 48Gb/s, 8K120P – 96G/s ‒ SDI  IP Network: More data to users ‒ Radio  Internet distribution: Less bandwidth restriction ‒ Mixed Broadcasting Live and PC world (VR/AR/360) • Issue: ‒ Need for Higher Bandwidth of Network • Solution 1. Higher Bandwidth per Lane  25 GbE , 50 GbE 2. Multiple Lines in Parallel  40 GbE (4 x 10 GbE ), 100 GbE (10 x 10 GbE ) 3. 1 & 2  50 GbE (2 x 25 GbE ), 100 GbE (4 x 25 GbE ) 4. Compressed Streams  J2K -ULL, TICO, JPEG -XS 4 © 2019 M3L Inc. Next System: 25 GbE - based • Uncompressed or Light -Compressed = Simpler and Less Latency 5 Quoted from http://jt -nm.org/documents/JT -NM_TR -1001 -1:2018_v1.0.pdf 10G/ 25G ports 10G/40G ports 25G / 100G ( 4x25G ) ports 1G/10G ports 1G/10G ports 1G/10G ports 1G/10G ports • Scalable and Extendable for 4K/8K systems • Fewer Cables © 2019 M3L Inc. What’s 25 GbE ? • Specified as IEEE 802.3by and cc 6 25 GbE - (Data rate: 25 Gbit/s - Line code: 64b/66b with RS -FEC(528,514) × NRZ - Line rate: 25.7813 GBd - Full -Duplex) Name Standard Media OFC or RFC Transceiver Module Reach in km # of Media Lanes 25GBASE -CR Direct Attach 802.3by -2016 (CL110) twinaxial balanced SFP28 (SFF -8402) SFP28 0.005 2 1 25GBASE -CR-S Direct Attach 802.3by -2016 (CL110) twinaxial balanced SFP28 (SFF -8402) SFP28 0.003 1 1 25GBASE -KR 802.3by -2016 (CL111) Cu-Backplane N/A N/A 0.001 1 2 25GBASE -KR-S 802.3by -2016 (CL111) Cu-Backplane N/A N/A 0.001 1 1 25GAUI 802.3by -2016 (CL109A/B) Cu-Backplane N/A N/A 0.00025 2 1 25GBASE -SR 802.3by -2016 (CL112) Fiber 850 nm LC SFP28 OM3: 0.07 2 1 OM4: 0.1 25GBASE -LR 802.3cc -2017 (CL114) Fiber 1295 – 1325 nm LC SFP28 OS2: 10 2 1 25GBASE -ER 802.3cc -2017 (CL114) Fiber 1550 nm LC SFP28 OS2: 40 2 1 c.f.) 10 GbE - (Data rate: 10 Gbit/s - Line code: 64b/66b × NRZ - Line rate: 10.3125 GBd - Full -Duplex) 10GBASE -SR 802.3ae -2002 (CL49/52) Fiber 850 nm SC LC SFP+ XENPAK, X2 XPAK, XFP OM1: 0.033 2 1 OM2: 0.082 OM3: 0.3 OM4: 0.4 10GBASE -LR 802.3ae -2002 (CL49/52) Fiber 1310 nm SC LC SFP+ XENPAK, X2 XPAK, XFP OS2: 10 2 1 • http://www.ieee802.org/3/by/index.html • http://www.ieee802.org/3/cc/index.html • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/25_Gigabit_Ethernet Quoted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/25_Gigabit_Ethernet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10_Gigabit_Ethernet © 2019 M3L Inc. What’s 25 GbE ? (cont’d) • 25 GbE technology have been used in 100 GbE since 2010 7 100 GbE (25GbE -based) - Data rate: 100 Gbit/s - Line code: 256b/257b × RS -FEC (528,514) × NRZ - Line rate: 4x 25.78125 GBd - Full -Duplex Name Standard Media OFC or RFC Transceiver Module Reach in km # of Media Lanes 100GBASE -CO4 Direct Attach 802.3bj -2010 (CL92) twinaxial balanced QSFP28, (SFF -8665) CFP2, CFP4 QSFP28 CFP2, CFP4 0.005 4 4 100GBASE -KO4 802.3bj -2014 (CL93) Cu-Backplane N/A N/A 0.001 1 4 100GBASE -KM4 802.3bj -2014 (CL94) Cu-Backplane N/A N/A 0.001 1 4 100GBASE -SR4 802.3bm -2015 (CL95) Fiber 850 nm MPO/MTP (MPO -12) QSFP28 CFP2, CFP4, CPAK OM3: 0.07 2 4 OM4: 0.1 100GBASE -LR4 802.3ba -2010 (CL88) Fiber 1295.56 nm, 1300.05 nm 1304.59 nm, 1309.14 nm LC QSFP28 CFP, CFP2 CFP4, CPAK OSx : 10 2 4 100GBASE -ER4 802.3ba -2010 (CL88) Fiber 1295.56 nm, 1300.05 nm 1304.59 nm, 1309.14 nm LC QSFP28 CFP, CFP2 OSx : 40 2 4 c.f.) 100 GbE (10GbE -based) - Data rate: 100 Gbit/s - Line code: 64b/66b × NRZ - Line rate: 10x 10.3125 GBd = 103.125 GBd - Full -Duplex 100GBASE -SR10 802.3ba -2010 (CL82/86) Fiber 850 nm MPO/MTP (MPO -24) CXP, CFP, CFP2 CFP4, CPAK OM3: 0.1 2 10 OM4: 0.15 c.f.) 40 GbE - Data rate: 40 Gbit/s - Line code: 64b/66b × NRZ - Line rate: 4x 10.3125 GBd = 41.25 GBd - Full -Duplex 40GBASE -SQ4 802.3ba -2010 (CL82/86) Fiber 850 nm MPO/MTP (MPO -12) CFP, QSFP+ OM3: 0.1 1 4 OM4: 0.15 40GBASE -LR4 802.3ba -2010 (CL82/87) Fiber 1264.5 – 1277.5 nm, 1284.5 – 1297.5 nm 1304.5 – 1317.5 nm LC CFP QSFP+ OSx : 10 2 4 40GBASE -ER4 802.3bm -2015 (CL82/87) QSFP+ OSx : 40 40GBASE -FR 802.3bg -2011 (CL82/89) Fiber 1550 nm LC CFP OSx : 2 2 1 Quoted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_Gigabit_Ethernet © 2019 M3L Inc. Mechanical Interface 8 10GbE based Quoted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_form -factor_pluggable_transceiver https://www.ebay.com/itm/10M -Laser -Optimized -LC-LC-10-Gigabit -50-125 -Multimode -Fiber -Optical -Patch -Cable/262525643736 https://www.amazon.co.uk/LINK -lklclc3540 -Fibre -multimode -duplex -OM3 -50/dp/B078RM5T48 https://jp.rs -online.com/web/p/products/8208316/ http://www.fiber -patch -cord.com/photo/pl15985813 -8_core_12_core_24_core_fiber_optical_mpo_mtp_patch_cord_mpo_connector.jpg http://www.fowiki.com/b/fast -field -terminate -mpo -connectors/ https://jp.rs -online.com/web/p/fibre -optic -transceivers/8842095/ https://www.finisar.com/optical -transceivers/ftlf8538p4bcl https://www.ebay.ie/itm/382208186498 LC connector LC OM3 optical fiber SFP cage QSFP cage QSFP+ transceiver SFP+ transceiver 25GbE based SFP28 transceiver LC OM3 optical fiber LC connector MPO OM3 fiber cable QSFP28 transceiver SFP cage QSFP cage MPO/MTP connector • Almost the same interface between 10GbE -based and 25GbE -based system © 2019 M3L Inc. 100 GbE transceivers • CFP  QSFP28 : the same cage for QSFP+ (40GbE) 9 Quoted from https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/2_Liu_Optics_Evolution_And_v1.pdf © 2019 M3L Inc. Challenge to 25 GbE - based System • Criteria 1. Cost 2. Reliability 3. Number of Products … 10 © 2019 M3L Inc. Cost of 25 GbE - based products • L3 Switches: Sub -$10K @ 2 – 4Tb/s throughput ‒ Non -Blocking, Spine/Leaf, Low Latency ‒ Major SWes recently have 10 & 25GbE dual -purpose ports • Cisco, Arista, Mellanox, etc. 11 0.01 0.1 1 10 PRICE (USD/GBPS) MAX REACH (KM) Optical Transceiver Module Price Range 10GBASE-SR 10GBASE-LR 25GBASE-SR 25GBASE-LR 100GBASE-SR4 • Optical Modules: $100 – $1K ‒ 10 GbE based: SFP+/QSFP ‒ 25 GbE based: SFP28/QSFP28 ‒ Price difference • Compatibility • Reach : SR, LR • Bandwidth : 10G, 25G, 40G, 100G • Warranty : 1 year, lifetime • Env Substances : RoHS, non -RoHS © 2019 M3L Inc. Affordable Chip and Board • Latest mid -range FPGA: ‒ Multiple 12G -SDI and 25GbE ports on a chip ‒ Reasonable chip price range ‒ Multiple DDR4 memory interface • Integrated FPGA modules: ‒ Faster to market ‒ Easier development by just putting it on a customer’s carrier board • Less design effort for signal integrity and power integrity of a high -speed and high -density board ‒ Very small size ‒ Good price: Sub -$1000 12 Quoted from https://image.matters.pro/products/im -m20 © 2019 M3L Inc. Reliability of 25 GbE network • RS -FEC in 25 GbE PHY/PCS for Bit Errors • Jitter and Wander of Video/Audio streams: 10 GbE vs 25 GbE … 13 © 2019 M3L Inc. Bit Error Rate 14 • 10 bit error @25 Gb/s BER Time 1E -12 6.7 minutes 1E -13 1.1 hours 1E -15 4.6 days • 95 % confidence BER Time 1E -12 2 minutes 1E -13 20 minutes 1E -15 1.4 days Quoted from http://www.ieee802.org/3/25GSG/public/Sept14/anslow_25GE_01_0914.pdf ST 2110 = UDP transmission  No error allows How complements bit errors  RS -FEC on PCS © 2019 M3L Inc. RS - FEC in 25GbE PHY • RS: Reed Solomon, FEC: Forward Error Correction ‒ c.f.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed%E2%80%93Solomon_error_correction • 25GbE: RS -FEC, BASE -R FEC, no FEC ‒ CL91: RS -FEC : Reed -Solomon – Latency: 250nS (5280 bits) ‒ CL74: BASE -R FEC: Firecode – Latency: 82nS (2112 bits) • Criteria: ‒ up to 5m: RS -FEC ‒ up to 3m, lower loss: RS -FEC or BASE -R FEC ‒ up to 3m, even lower loss: RS -FEC, BASE -R FEC, or no FEC • RS -FEC(528,514) ‒ Total symbols: n = 528, Message symbols: k = 514 ‒ Bits per symbol: m = 10, Correctable symbols: t = 7 15 Quoted from http://www.ieee802.org/3/by/public/Jan15/baden_3by_01b_0115.pdf © 2019 M3L Inc. ST 2110 with PTP Synchronization 16 Same? Timing Jitter Requirement 3G -SDI < 2UI 12G -SDI < 2UI UI := minimum time interval between condition changes of a data transmission signal UI = 0.333 ns / baud @ 3Gb/s (3G -SDI) UI = 0.083 ns /baud @ 12Gb/s (12G -SDI) Lock -time Requirement 5 sec with 1 uS PTP offset SDI Network IP Network Key Factor of Reliability: clock recovery @ receivers Low Latency ↓↑ tradeoff Buffer Size (overflow/underflow) … clock recovery performance © 2019 M3L Inc. Jitter and Wander Evaluation for ST 2110 • Jitter and Wander of reproduced SDI signals ‒ What’s Jitter/Wander ? • "the short -term (jitter) and the long -term (wander) variations of the significant instants of a digital signal from their ideal positions in time" The figures are quoted from the site above. 17 Quoted from http://users.rcn.com/wpacino/jitwtutr/jitwtutr.htm © 2019 M3L Inc. 25 GbE vs 10 GbE Evaluation 10/25G L2/L3 SW Mellanox SN2070 10/25G L2/L3 SW Arista Networks 7280SR2A SG / PTP Grandmaster LEADER LT4610 SFP+/ SFP28 M3L 2110 Ingress Core Xilinx FPGA M3L 2059 Slave Core SFP+/ SFP28 Xilinx FPGA M3L 2110 Egress Core M3L 2059 Slave Core FPGA Eva Board Xilinx KU116 FPGA Eva Board Xilinx KU116 Embrionix 12G -SDI/3G -SDI SFP Module 10GbE 10G/25GbE 3G -SDI(1080/59.94p) 12G -SD I(2160/59.94p) BB Analysis / Monitor Phabrix Qx12G 3G/12G -SDI 10G/25GbE 10G/25GbE 18 © 2019 M3L Inc. Evaluation Result: Jitter and Wander • Received video data on 25 GbE has the similar quality as on 10 GbE 19 12G -SDI / 25GbE Jitter (< 2UI) 3G -SDI / 10 GbE Jitter (< 2UI) 12G -SDI / 10GbE wander 3G -SDI /10 GbE wander Jitter: 25 GbE vs 10 GbE Wander: 25 GbE vs 10 GbE UI Same absolute value range 19 © 2019 M3L Inc. Evaluation Result: Lock time • Working to make it faster convergence ‒ Even though we met the ST 2059 requirements : PTP offset = 1 uS within 5 sec Lock time 20 © 2019 M3L Inc. Number of 25 GbE - based Products • Let’s take a look lots of 25GbE -based products in NAB Show this year ‒ Tektronix @ SU5006 : Media Monitor/Analyzer ‒ Cisco Systems @ SU8510 : L3 switches ‒ Arista Networks @ N3008 : L3 switches ‒ Mellanox Technologies @ SL6025 : L3 switches ‒ Nextera Video @ SL10230 : FPGA IP Cores ‒ Image Matters @ C8826 : FPGA Modules … etc 21 ‒ Ikegami @C7925 : 4K Camera Control Unit ‒ FOR -A @ C5016 : 4K Video Switcher * ‒ LEADER @ C8508 : 4K Wave Form Monitor, Rasterizer ‒ Matrox @ SL3808 : Network Card ‒ Grass Valley @ SL106 : Universal Optional Card ‒ AJA @ SL2416 : ‒ Embrionix @ N2508 : ‒ Imagine Communications @ SL1516 : ‒ EVERTZ @ N1503 : Media Gateway * prototype © 2019 M3L Inc. 25GbE Advantage • Compact ‒ 200 Gb/s in 1 slot (8 ports x 25 Gb/s) • Multiple streams per port ‒ 16 in / 16 out x 1080i (1.5G) ‒ 8 in / 8 out x 1080p (3G) ‒ 2 in / 2 out x 2160p (4K) • Configurable per port ‒ More flexible compared with 40/100 GbE ‒ ST 2110 or ST 2022 -6 per port ‒ 25 GbE or 10 GbE per port ‒ Different type of configured multiple streams can be trunked 22 Quoted from https://www.for -a.com/news_events/news_releases_1902261.html * prototype * prototype © 2019 M3L Inc. Conclusion • 25 GbE -based production system is almost ready in production ‒ Already reasonable cost range ‒ Similar network quality with 10 GbE ‒ More new equipment supported 25 GbE seems to be launched this year • Historically users want as high bandwidth network as possible if it’s at the similar cost • Let’s find 25 GbE -based solutions in NAB Show! • Let’s start using 25 GbE !! 23 © 2019 M3L Inc. C U R A T E D B Y I P S H O W C A S E T H E AT E R AT N A B – A P R I L 8 -11 , 2 01 9 Thank You :) Koji Oyama, M3L Inc. oyama@m3l.co.jp +81 -90 -1127 -2023 +1(408)714 -8808
Downloads: 8